Social media marketing is undeniably a powerful tool for startups, especially when trying to stretch budgets and maximize results. A successful social media strategy can provide startups with a competitive edge, attract new customers, and increase overall brand awareness. However, sometimes, it might take a bit of controversy to truly stand out from the crowd.
While controversial tactics require careful navigation and must be executed judiciously, they can yield significant results when done ethically and creatively. In this article, we explore how startups can use controversial tactics in their social media marketing to maximize budgets, results, and brand distinctiveness.
Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)
One of the controversial tactics startups can employ is Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD). This strategy, often used in highly competitive markets, involves creating unease about competitors' offerings, subtly swaying potential customers towards one's own products or services.
Consider Oracle, the database software giant, known for using FUD against competitors like SAP and Microsoft. Despite its controversy, this tactic has helped Oracle position itself as a dominant player in the market.
However, it's essential to use FUD responsibly, avoiding unfounded or dishonest claims. The goal should be to emphasize the unique advantages of your offering rather than disparaging competitors unfairly.
Social Proof Manipulation
Social proof, like positive reviews or testimonials, enhances a brand's credibility. Yet, some companies opt for manipulating social proof by purchasing fake reviews or followers. Although generally frowned upon and potentially harmful if discovered, it's an approach that has been used by various businesses.
Take the now-defunct social media marketing company, Devumi, for instance. They sold millions of fake followers to celebrities, businesses, and anyone looking to boost their social media presence. This controversial strategy provided short-term perceived popularity but led to significant backlash and legal consequences once uncovered.
As a startup, you could experiment with enhancing social proof, but it's imperative to focus on authentic engagement and genuine audience growth rather than resorting to deceptive tactics.
Growth Hacking
Growth hacking involves using innovative, often low-cost marketing tactics to achieve rapid growth. Sometimes, it can involve borderline ethical practices, but when executed responsibly, growth hacking can yield impressive results.
A classic example is Airbnb. The startup exploited a loophole in Craigslist’s system to access their vast user base, encouraging people to cross-post their Airbnb listings on Craigslist. This controversial but ingenious strategy played a significant part in Airbnb's rapid growth.
For startups, the lesson here is to think outside the box and identify potential growth hacking opportunities that align with your brand and audience.
Newsjacking
Newsjacking is a practice of leveraging trending news stories to draw attention to your brand. While this strategy can be risky and attract criticism if the news event is sensitive or not related to your brand, it can also result in high levels of engagement and visibility.
Oreo demonstrated this during the 2013 Super Bowl. When the stadium lights went out for 34 minutes, Oreo quickly tweeted "You can still dunk in the dark." The tweet went viral, earning Oreo massive recognition for their quick, clever response.
Startups can use newsjacking to position their brand at the forefront of trending conversations, enhancing visibility. However, they must be sensitive to the context and content of the news event to avoid potential backlash.
Clickbait
Clickbait, or crafting headlines or content so compelling that people can't resist clicking on them, is another controversial but effective strategy. Although often associated with misleading headlines or low-quality content, when done right, it can significantly increase traffic and engagement.
Buzzfeed is notorious for its use of clickbait, often producing content with headlines that entice curiosity and command clicks. As a startup, if you choose to use this tactic, ensure your content delivers on the promise of the headline. Misleading your audience can lead to a loss of trust and credibility.
Polarization
Lastly, taking a stand on a divisive issue or adopting a polarizing brand persona can make your startup stand out. Polarization can lead to fierce loyalty from those who align with your stance but be prepared to alienate others.
Take the example of Cards Against Humanity, a card game known for its dark humor and controversial content. Their bold, unapologetic branding has won them a dedicated following, but not without its fair share of criticism.
However, it's crucial to remember that controversy for controversy's sake rarely ends well. Ensure that any stance you take aligns with your brand values and doesn't alienate your target audience.
Be Careful
While these controversial strategies can deliver results, they must be employed with caution and discretion. Balancing the fine line between controversy and offensiveness requires a deep understanding of your audience, cultural sensitivity, and strategic execution. Startups need to remember that maintaining ethical standards and delivering genuine value to customers should always be at the heart of any marketing strategy.
Using controversial tactics may help you stand out and get noticed, but it's building trust, credibility, and positive relationships with your audience that will ultimately lead to long-term success.
When Controversial Tactics Go Wrong: Cautionary Tales
While we have considered the potential advantages of using controversial marketing strategies, it's crucial to also understand the potential pitfalls. There have been instances where these tactics have backfired, damaging brand reputations and leading to public backlash. Here are a few cautionary tales that highlight the risks associated with controversial marketing tactics.
Pepsi's Misguided Activism
A classic example of controversy gone wrong is Pepsi's 2017 commercial featuring Kendall Jenner. The ad showed Jenner ending a protest by handing a Pepsi can to a police officer, sparking outrage for its perceived trivialization of serious social issues and protest movements. The ad was quickly pulled, and Pepsi issued an apology. This example illustrates the danger of engaging with sensitive issues without a deep understanding or authentic connection.
Fyre Festival's Unrealistic Promises
The Fyre Festival disaster offers a lesson in the perils of over-promising and under-delivering. The festival was promoted through social media with a high-profile influencer campaign, creating enormous anticipation. However, the reality failed to match the glamorous image portrayed online, resulting in massive disappointment, public outcry, and legal action. This example serves as a warning against using social proof manipulation and growth hacking without a solid product or service to back up the hype.
Kenneth Cole's Insensitive Newsjacking
In the realm of newsjacking, few examples are as notorious as Kenneth Cole's inappropriate tweet during the 2011 Egyptian uprising. The fashion brand tried to leverage the trending event to promote their new collection, tweeting: "Millions are in uproar in #Cairo. Rumor is they heard our new spring collection is now available online." The attempt was met with widespread condemnation for its insensitivity towards a serious political crisis. The incident shows the risks of newsjacking sensitive or unrelated issues purely for promotional gain.
JCPenney's Misleading Clickbait
In 2012, retail giant JCPenney embarked on a "fair and square" pricing strategy, promising straightforward, low prices without the need for constant sales or discounts. However, they failed to deliver on this promise, resorting back to high-low pricing within a year. This misleading strategy alienated customers and led to a significant drop in sales. It demonstrates that while clickbait might draw attention, it can cause serious damage if it does not deliver on its promises.
Ryanair's Polarizing Persona
Lastly, Ryanair, the budget airline, is known for its polarizing persona, largely driven by its outspoken former CEO, Michael O'Leary. His controversial comments and the airline's aggressive cost-cutting measures have garnered substantial attention but at the expense of customer satisfaction and brand reputation. This example shows that a polarizing brand persona, while attention-grabbing, can also alienate customers and tarnish your brand's image.
A Warning from The Past
These cautionary tales underscore the risks associated with using controversial tactics in social media marketing. While such tactics can indeed draw attention and differentiate your brand, they can also backfire spectacularly, causing reputational damage and customer alienation.
As a startup, it's crucial to balance the desire to stand out with a commitment to authenticity, ethical practices, and providing real value. Controversial tactics can be part of a successful social media marketing strategy, but they should be used judiciously, ethically, and always with a deep understanding of your audience. Ultimately, the key to effective social media marketing lies not in creating controversy, but in fostering genuine connections and delivering consistent, quality experiences for your audience.
Risk Versus Reward: Balancing Controversial Tactics in Social Media Marketing
In the realm of social media marketing, particularly for startups, the risk-versus-reward equation is a critical factor to consider when employing controversial tactics. The potential for increased visibility and rapid growth must be weighed against the possible backlash and reputational damage.
Risk: Reputational Damage
As the examples above illustrate, controversial marketing tactics can lead to significant reputational damage. A poorly conceived campaign, insensitivity to social issues, or deceptive practices can harm your brand's image, leading to lost customers, lower sales, and in severe cases, legal implications.
Moreover, in today's digital age, news spreads rapidly, and the internet rarely forgets. A misstep in your marketing strategy can have long-term negative effects, living on in search results and social media discussions long after the incident.
Risk: Alienating Your Audience
Controversial tactics, by their nature, can polarize audiences. While you might attract a segment of the market, you risk alienating others. Startups must therefore have a deep understanding of their target audience and be willing to risk potentially losing or offending some sections of their market.
For instance, a brand taking a strong stance on a divisive social issue may strengthen its bond with customers who agree with that position, but it may completely lose those who stand on the opposite side of the issue. This tactic should be approached with a clear understanding of your audience's values and a readiness to potentially sacrifice wider appeal for deeper loyalty.
Reward: Increased Visibility and Engagement
Despite the risks, controversial tactics can undoubtedly lead to increased visibility. Taking a stand on a contentious issue, riding on a trending news story, or leveraging the shock factor can get people talking about your brand, extending your reach, and increasing engagement.
Brands like Cards Against Humanity and Ryanair have embraced controversy as part of their brand persona, reaping rewards in terms of visibility and memorability. However, these brands have accepted the trade-off of alienating some potential customers.
Reward: Rapid Growth
In the startup world, rapid growth can often be the difference between success and failure. Controversial tactics, particularly growth hacking strategies, can provide the boost needed to achieve this rapid expansion. Airbnb's early strategy of leveraging Craigslist's user base is a classic example of a controversial growth hacking tactic that yielded substantial rewards.
Navigating the Risk-Reward Continuum
Navigating the risk-reward continuum requires strategic decision-making, ethical judgment, and a deep understanding of your brand and audience. Here are a few guidelines:
Align with your brand values: Ensure any controversial tactic aligns with your brand's core values. Authenticity is key to building trust with your audience.
Know your audience: Understand the values, beliefs, and preferences of your target audience. This knowledge will help you predict their reaction and assess the potential risks and rewards.
Deliver value: Whether your tactics are controversial or not, always aim to provide genuine value to your audience. Deceptive or manipulative tactics may offer short-term gains, but they rarely lead to long-term success.
Be prepared to react: If you choose to employ controversial tactics, be prepared to respond quickly to any backlash. Having a well-prepared crisis management strategy is essential.
In today's competitive business landscape, startup companies often leverage controversial tactics in their social media marketing operations to maximise their budgets and results. These unconventional strategies can significantly boost visibility and engagement, leading to increased brand awareness and lead generation.
However, using such tactics can be a double-edged sword. The same elements that make these strategies attractive—their novelty, disruptive nature, and potential for virality—also carry inherent risks. These include potential backlash, damage to brand reputation, and the possibility of alienating audiences. Examples like Pepsi's ill-conceived commercial or the disaster of Fyre Festival's over-promising serve as potent reminders of the risks involved.
When done right, controversial strategies like newsjacking, growth hacking, clickbait, and polarization can be powerful tools. For instance, Cards Against Humanity's edgy brand persona has cultivated a dedicated following, while LinkedIn's polarizing B2B campaigns have achieved significant results.
However, startups should be mindful of the risks involved and follow a set of guidelines when employing such strategies. These include aligning with brand values, understanding the target audience, delivering value, and being prepared to manage potential fallout.
Balancing the risk-versus-reward equation is crucial.
The lure of increased visibility and rapid growth needs to be weighed against potential reputational damage and audience alienation. A startup that can strategically navigate this risk-reward continuum while maintaining authenticity and delivering genuine value will be well-positioned for success in the dynamic world of social media marketing.
Comments